[FFmpeg-devel] Proposal of two projects for GSoC

[Soft Works]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Artem Galin
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:31 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Proposal of two projects for GSoC
> 
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 17:01, Soft Works <softworkz at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > > Artem Galin
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 4:40 PM
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Proposal of two projects for GSoC
> > >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Please find the proposal for the following two projects for GSoC
> > > this
> > year.
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Title: oneAPI Video Processing Library (oneVPL) for CPU & GPU
> > > hardware accelleration (https://www.oneapi.com/)
> > >
> > > Description: Add support for oneVPL
> > >
> >
> > Hi Artem,
> >
> > I hope your doing fine! Your v7 patch for D3D11 QSV is now mostly
> > identical to my original code (except defaulting to D3D11), and I'm
> > pretty glad about that outcome. Probably meanwhile you came to
> > understand why I didn't want to submit the code myself, but I hadn't
> > expected that even Intel is being ignored here for so long :-(
> >
> > That being said, I have two questions regarding oneVPL:
> >
> > 1. From all the docs I've read, it was always about limitations of oneVPL
> >    In relation to MediaSDK. Is there a single thing which oneVPL can do
> >    that can't  be done with MediaSDK?
> >
> > 2. Will MediaSDK be discontinued, renamed or continued to coexist with
> >    oneVPL?
> >
> > Thanks and kind regards,
> > softworkz
> >
> >
> Hi Softworkz,
> 
> Proposal is forward looking. Stay tuned for more details about oneVPL.

Hi Artem,

Besides details, what benefits does it provide?

And

> 2. Will MediaSDK be discontinued, renamed or continued to coexist with
> >    oneVPL?

Thanks,
softworkz