[FFmpeg-devel] FATE-Suite Data Test Data

Andreas Rheinhardt andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com
Fri Dec 10 21:21:22 EET 2021


Soft Works:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Andreas
>> Rheinhardt
>> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 8:00 PM
>> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FATE-Suite Data Test Data
>>
>> Soft Works:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> can we add the attached file (SubRip_capability_tester2.srt) to the fate-
>> suite data?
>>>
>>> Compared to SubRip_capability_tester.srt, it has one line removed that
>> would
>>> cause (legitimate) trailing whitespace in some ref data files.
>>>
>>> It hasn’t been an issue so far due to a bug in the encoders which didn’t
>> properly
>>> convert ASS hard-space tags (\h) and incorrectly emitted them as “\h” text.
>>> After fixing this, encoders to formats which don’t have a concept of “hard
>> spaces”,
>>> will output \h as regular spaces, and in the case of that single source
>> line
>>> that I have removed in the source file, this would lead to trailing spaces
>> in the
>>> ref files.
>>>
>>> As I don’t know how, when or whether at all this can be fixed in a way that
>> it
>>> could work with patches transported via e-mail, this single line change
>> seems
>>> to be the best quick solution to the problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> softworkz
>>>
>>
>> I don't think that this will help. Trailing whitespace should actually
>> only lead to a warning when applying (depending upon core.whitespace).
>>
>> Your patch is broken: There is a line "\ N is a forced line break" in
>> the current ref file which ends with \r\n. This line is not marked as
>> changed in your patchfile, but it is part of the surrounding context of
>> a diff; and said line of context uses only \n and is therefore not
>> recognized.
>>
>> And when I create a diff where the patch file has the proper context, it
>> still fails; I need to add the "--keep-cr" option to git am to make it
>> work. But then it works, whereas this option didn't help if the patch
>> file only has \n instead of \r\n.
>>
>> - Andreas
> 
> Thanks for looking into this.
> 
> I'm simply going after the patchwork error from my recent submnission:
> 
> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/check/47132/
> --------------------------
> 	.git/rebase-apply/patch:131: trailing whitespace.
> A letter followed by 05 hard spaces: A     
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:192: trailing whitespace.
> A letter followed by 05 hard spaces: A     
> error: patch failed: tests/ref/fate/sub-textenc:160
> error: tests/ref/fate/sub-textenc: patch does not apply
> error: Did you hand edit your patch?
> It does not apply to blobs recorded in its index.
> --------------------------
> 
> It fails exactly at the line that I have removed in 
> SubRip_capability_tester2.srt

No, it does not. Look at the error: "error: patch failed:
tests/ref/fate/sub-textenc:160"
Line 160 is "\ N is a forced line break", the first line of context with
\r\n. It has nothing to do with the line you removed. The
trailing-whitespace stuff just leads to warnings, not errors.

- Andreas


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list