[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 10/10] lavfi/vf_scale: pass the thread count to the scaler

Anton Khirnov anton at khirnov.net
Sun Aug 29 19:48:36 EEST 2021


Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2021-08-09 22:30:06)
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 07:29:41PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > ---
> >  libavfilter/vf_scale.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
> > index b62fb37d4b..14e202bf77 100644
> > --- a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
> > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
> > @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ static int config_props(AVFilterLink *outlink)
> >              av_opt_set_int(*s, "sws_flags", scale->flags, 0);
> >              av_opt_set_int(*s, "param0", scale->param[0], 0);
> >              av_opt_set_int(*s, "param1", scale->param[1], 0);
> > +            av_opt_set_int(*s, "threads", ff_filter_get_nb_threads(ctx), 0);
> >              if (scale->in_range != AVCOL_RANGE_UNSPECIFIED)
> >                  av_opt_set_int(*s, "src_range",
> >                                 scale->in_range == AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG, 0);
> > -- 
> > 2.30.2
> 
> breaks:
> ./ffmpeg -i ~/tickets/1012/IV50_random_points.avi  -threads 5 -y file1012.avi
> 
> it contains horizontal bright green lines

Should be fixed with the updated patches I sent just now.

That said, I think the special 410->420 scaler should be dropped - its
output fundamentally depends on how the slices are submitted. Given that
410 is a pretty obscure format, it's unlikely anyone needs a super-fast
non-exact conversion.

-- 
Anton Khirnov


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list