[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] make QSV works with Intel's oneVPL

Xiang, Haihao haihao.xiang at intel.com
Wed Aug 25 11:40:17 EEST 2021


On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 05:06 +0000, Soft Works wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Xiang,
> > Haihao
> > Sent: Monday, 23 August 2021 06:29
> > To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] make QSV works with Intel's
> > oneVPL
> > 
> > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 15:33 +0800, Haihao Xiang wrote:
> > > The oneAPI Video Processing Library (oneVPL) is a single interface for
> > > encode, decode and video processing[1]. oneVPL is a successor to Intel's
> > 
> > Media
> > > SDK (MediaSDK), but removed obsolete features. MediaSDK lifetime comes to
> > 
> > an
> > > end now[2].
> > > 
> > > This patchset fixes compiler errors when building FFmpeg against oneVPL
> > > and
> > > uses
> > > a new way to create MFX session for oneVPL. New features for oneVPL will
> > > be
> > > implemented in other patchset.
> > > 
> > > The oneVPL source code:
> > > https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneVPL
> > > The oneVPL runtime for new Intel Gen platforms:
> > > https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneVPL-intel-gpu
> > > 
> > > [1]
> > 
> > https://spec.oneapi.io/versions/latest/elements/oneVPL/source/index.html
> > > [2] https://github.com/Intel-Media-SDK/MediaSDK/#media-sdk-support-matrix
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Zhong / Mark / Softworkz,
> > 
> > Is there any comment to this new patchset version? This version should not
> > have
> > any impact to current user if --enable-libmfx option is used. We added --
> > enable-
> > onevpl option for oneVPL usage but the suffix 'qsv' is still used in codec
> > and
> > filter, so user needn't change their app or command if they don't use the
> > obsolete features.
> 
> 
> Hi Haihao,
> 
> I'm still struggling to understand this. You are doing a major version bump
> to 2.x even there's not a single benefit but features are being removed 
> instead.
> 
> At this time, I don't see any plausible reason to move away from libmfx.

According to the links[1][2] below, MediaSDK is going to be supported in
maintenance mode, new features will be added only to oneVPL, including the new
features for future hardwares. The deleted features are less used in practice.

oneVPL dispatcher may load multiple runtimes, user may use dispatcher APIs to
find an available implementation[3], so it is possible to run FFmpeg with libvpl
on different implementations. 

This patchset is not to replace libmfx with libvpl, libmfx is still used if
running configure with --enable-libmfx option.

[1]https://github.com/Intel-Media-SDK/MediaSDK/#media-sdk-support-matrix
[2]
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/upgrading-from-msdk-to-onevpl.html
[3]
https://spec.oneapi.io/versions/latest/elements/oneVPL/source/API_ref/VPL_disp_api_func.html#dispatcher-api-function-reference

Thanks
Haiaho

> 
> Kind regards,
> softworkz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list