[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/7] avutil/common: Implement av_sat_add64_c() with fewer branches

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Sat Oct 24 20:08:20 EEST 2020


On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:17:41PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> > Michael Niedermayer:
> > > No benchmark because this is not used in any speed relevant pathes nor is it
> > > used where __builtin_add_overflow is available.
> > > So I do not know how to realistically benchmark it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> > > ---
> > >  libavutil/common.h | 9 ++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/libavutil/common.h b/libavutil/common.h
> > > index 92b721a59c..a48c0648f8 100644
> > > --- a/libavutil/common.h
> > > +++ b/libavutil/common.h
> > > @@ -303,11 +303,10 @@ static av_always_inline int64_t av_sat_add64_c(int64_t a, int64_t b) {
> > >      int64_t tmp;
> > >      return !__builtin_add_overflow(a, b, &tmp) ? tmp : (tmp < 0 ? INT64_MAX : INT64_MIN);
> > >  #else
> > > -    if (b >= 0 && a >= INT64_MAX - b)
> > > -        return INT64_MAX;
> > > -    if (b <= 0 && a <= INT64_MIN - b)
> > > -        return INT64_MIN;
> > > -    return a + b;
> > > +    int64_t s = a+(uint64_t)b;
> > > +    if ((int64_t)(a^b | ~s^b) >= 0)
> > > +        return b < 0 ? INT64_MIN : INT64_MAX;
> > > +    return s;
> > >  #endif
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > 
> > Returning INT64_MAX ^ (b >> 63) would have even less branches
> 
> will do that in case noone objects to the patch itself

will apply

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either
wrong or dead since a long time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20201024/2da21c42/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list