[FFmpeg-devel] Next developer meeting

Steven Liu lingjiujianke at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 15:33:55 EET 2020


Steven Liu <lingjiujianke at gmail.com> 于2020年11月11日周三 下午9:29写道:
>
> Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> 于2020年11月11日周三 下午9:20写道:
> >
> > James Almer (12020-11-11):
> > > What i know we were discussing was to merge lavd into lavf, since their
> > > current dependency state is pretty hacky and makes development and extension
> > > of certain lavf public structs a pain.
> > > It's why i didn't apply my iterate api set just yet.
> > >
> > > I don't recall anything about splitting IO, but what does it achieve beyond
> > > making lavf lighter? Are there users out there that could care about linking
> > > to an hypothetical lavio while not caring about other lavf functionality?
> >
> > Well, I think by now everybody knows what I think of the splitting of
> > the libraries (we should move towards a single libffmpeg.so,
> Yes, merge libs to libffmpeg.so or libffmpeg.a is very convenient to
> mobile developing,
> for example only link one lib is ok.
> we merge libs to libffmpeg.so by outselves now, and i saw ijkplayer do
> it so too.

What about make and option in configure and let the option be choosed by users?
> > else makes our work more complicated for no practical benefit that could
> > be achieved another simpler way).
> >
> > But I would like to add:
> >
> > This is a tricky technical discussion. Arguing it properly requires time
> > to state things clearly and to gather arguments. A developer meeting in
> > real-time chat is absolutely not the place for it. It can be the place
> > to finish the discussion if necessary, but not the place to lead the
> > bulk of it.
> >
> > In fact, nothing should be on a developers meeting agenda that has not
> > already been extensively discussed on the list.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> >   Nicolas George
> Thanks
> Steven


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list