[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avfilter/vf_edgedetect: properly implement double_threshold()
lance.lmwang at gmail.com
lance.lmwang at gmail.com
Sun Jul 5 04:37:50 EEST 2020
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 01:03:48PM -0400, Andriy Gelman wrote:
> On Mon, 29. Jun 09:26, Valery Kot wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM Andriy Gelman <andriy.gelman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > lgtm. I saw a small improvement when testing.
> > >
> > > Would be nice to allow weak edges that become strong to trigger neighboring weak
> > > edges in the future.
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> >
> > You are right, ideally double_threshold should be recursive (seed from
> > each "high" peak and spread over "low" peaks). But then potentially we
> > may end up with width*height/2 recursion depth, which may lead to
> > stack overflow. So probably some recursion limit is needed, and hence
> > suboptimal solution.
> >
> > Or iterative approach, running through the complete image again and
> > again checking if "low" peaks are touching already selected edge
> > pixels. Stop when no new pixels can be added to the edge. Better, but
> > still potentially width*height/2 iterations with width*height
> > operations each, completely killing performance.
> >
> > Maybe later I'll try to implement it in a generic way, but this is out
> > of scope for this patch.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Valery Kot
>
> Any objections if I apply this patch?
The patch look fine to me, but no sign-off?
>
> --
> Andriy
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
--
Thanks,
Limin Wang
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list