[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mov: update extensions
Gyan
ffmpeg at gyani.pro
Tue Jan 28 07:44:24 EET 2020
On 27-01-2020 10:40 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 18:07 Uhr schrieb Gyan <ffmpeg at gyani.pro>:
>>
>>
>> On 27-01-2020 10:22 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Gyan <ffmpeg at gyani.pro>:
>>>>
>>>> On 27-01-2020 09:55 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>>> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 17:10 Uhr schrieb Gyan <ffmpeg at gyani.pro>:
>>>>>> On 27-01-2020 09:04 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 11:31 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg at gyani.pro>:
>>>>>>>> Added all extensions used by the mov muxer family
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> libavformat/mov.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
>>>>>>>> index 589576b529..21a5a0180e 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/libavformat/mov.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/libavformat/mov.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -8073,7 +8073,7 @@ AVInputFormat ff_mov_demuxer = {
>>>>>>>> .long_name = NULL_IF_CONFIG_SMALL("QuickTime / MOV"),
>>>>>>>> .priv_class = &mov_class,
>>>>>>>> .priv_data_size = sizeof(MOVContext),
>>>>>>>> - .extensions = "mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2",
>>>>>>>> + .extensions = "mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2,psp,m4v,m4b,ism,ismv,isma,f4v",
>>>>>>> Is this supposed to fix anything?
>>>>>>> I ask because iirc the demuxer does not work for files not detected or do I
>>>>>>> misremember?
>>>>>> Keeping the list up to date.
>>>>> I believe patches should at least theoretically fix issues but imo, feel free
>>>>> to remove extensions for this demuxer if it makes you feel better.
>>>> I'm *adding* extensions.
>>> Since you are not claiming to fix an issue (or a theoretical issue), I was
>>> assuming you don't like to have an incomplete-looking list in the file.
>>> If that is correct, removing it is an option, no?
>> An empty list is even more incomplete.
>>
>> As I mentioned, the benefit is for cli users able to specify `-f ext`
>> as well as `-h demuxer=ext`
> I understand now.
>
>>>>> At least the m4v suffix is not such a good idea.
>>>> What does it clash with? Raw MPEG-4 Part 2 bitstreams?
>>> Yes.
>> Will remove.
> Thank you, Carl Eugen
Pushed as febd37f4bd9c8bb5290f1d72390e8228f7e02f30
Thanks,
Gyan
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list