[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use bit-exact check for dnn_processing

Guo, Yejun yejun.guo at intel.com
Mon Jan 20 03:15:43 EET 2020



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Carl Eugen Hoyos
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 2:55 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use bit-exact
> check for dnn_processing
> 
> Am Sa., 18. Jan. 2020 um 14:52 Uhr schrieb Steven Liu <lq at chinaffmpeg.org>:
> >
> >
> >
> > > 在 2020年1月18日,21:33,Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo at intel.com> 写道:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > >> Carl Eugen Hoyos
> > >> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:06 AM
> > >> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use
> bit-exact
> > >> check for dnn_processing
> > >>
> > >> Am Fr., 17. Jan. 2020 um 15:37 Uhr schrieb Guo, Yejun
> <yejun.guo at intel.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>> the reason is that the tested models are in float format
> > >>
> > >> The two reference files are ~1MB together: Do we want / need that?
> > >> (No opinion here.)
> > >
> > > how about just keeping one test (for format rgb24) for vf_dnn_processing?
> The rgb format might be the most popular format for vf_dnn_processing.
> > >
> > > And the test has two materials:
> > > 1)  fate-suite/dnn_processing/dnn_rgb_processing.model (can be
> renamed from halve_first_channel_float.model, 184 byte now)
> > > 2)  fate-suite/filter-reference/dnn_rgb_processing.raw (can be renamed
> from dnn_processing-halve_first_channel_float.raw, 446KB now)
> > >
> > > When we support more models (the most effort is to add more dnn layers in
> native mode),
> > > I can update both dnn_rgb_processing.model (the file size will be increased
> bit by bit) and dnn_rgb_processing.raw (the file size will not change much).
> > What about compress them to bz2? Uncompress them when need them?
> 
> No, we do not require bz2 for fate and should not add more requirements.

If there's no more comments, I'll keep one test for dnn_processing. thanks.

> 
> Carl Eugen
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list