[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/9] swscale: Add swscale input support for Y210LE

Kieran Kunhya kierank at obe.tv
Mon Jan 20 01:21:28 EET 2020


>
> > > Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 07:49 Uhr schrieb Fu, Linjie <
> linjie.fu at intel.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > > > > Carl Eugen Hoyos
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 02:30
> > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/9] swscale: Add swscale input
> > > support
> > > > > for Y210LE
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 07:59 Uhr schrieb Linjie Fu <
> linjie.fu at intel.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add swscale input support for Y210LE, output support and fate
> > > > > > test could be added later if there is requirement for software
> > > > > > CSC to this packed format.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please confirm that this works as expected on big-endian hardware.
> > > > >
> > > > If I understood correctly,  the concern is whether it works for Y210
> software
> > > scale
> > > > on big-endian hardware, and whether it would break fate.
> > >
> > > Exactly.
> > > Just confirm (either in the commit message or via mail) that you
> tested it.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > All fate tests passed on big-endian environment(ppc 64) except for the
> known dnn breaks.
>
> Perfect, thank you!
>

I think this commit needs input from the technical committee, putting these
packed formats into swscale opens a can of worms.
So far as we treated formats like v210 and v210x like codecs (rightly or
wrongly).

Kieran


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list