[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/9] swscale: Add swscale input support for Y210LE

[Paul B Mahol]

On 1/20/20, Kieran Kunhya <kierank at obe.tv> wrote:
>>
>> > > Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 07:49 Uhr schrieb Fu, Linjie <
>> linjie.fu at intel.com>:
>> > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
>> > > > > Carl Eugen Hoyos
>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 02:30
>> > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
>> > > > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/9] swscale: Add swscale input
>> > > support
>> > > > > for Y210LE
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 07:59 Uhr schrieb Linjie Fu <
>> linjie.fu at intel.com>:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Add swscale input support for Y210LE, output support and fate
>> > > > > > test could be added later if there is requirement for software
>> > > > > > CSC to this packed format.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please confirm that this works as expected on big-endian hardware.
>> > > > >
>> > > > If I understood correctly,  the concern is whether it works for Y210
>> software
>> > > scale
>> > > > on big-endian hardware, and whether it would break fate.
>> > >
>> > > Exactly.
>> > > Just confirm (either in the commit message or via mail) that you
>> tested it.
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > All fate tests passed on big-endian environment(ppc 64) except for the
>> known dnn breaks.
>>
>> Perfect, thank you!
>>
>
> I think this commit needs input from the technical committee, putting these
> packed formats into swscale opens a can of worms.
> So far as we treated formats like v210 and v210x like codecs (rightly or
> wrongly).
>

Technical committee is scam!

> Kieran
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".