[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use bit-exact check for dnn_processing

Guo, Yejun yejun.guo at intel.com
Sat Feb 1 16:50:41 EET 2020



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 9:45 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> Cc: Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH V2] fate/filter-video.mak: do not use bit-exact check for
> dnn_processing
> 
> The reason is that the tested models are in float format. And also
> remove fate-filter-dnn_processing-halve_gray_float to make reference
> files smaller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/fate/filter-video.mak                        |  7 +--
>  ...filter-dnn_processing-halve_first_channel_float | 55 ----------------------
>  .../fate/filter-dnn_processing-halve_gray_float    | 55 ----------------------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644
> tests/ref/fate/filter-dnn_processing-halve_first_channel_float
>  delete mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-dnn_processing-halve_gray_float
> 
> diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
> index 02986b5..6e744b5 100644
> --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
> +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak

I set up windows environment today with msys2 and configure with "--arch=x86_64 --target-os=mingw64",
this test also passed.  So, this fate passed on x86 + linux/windows, and IMB PowerPC + linux.

has not got an arm-based system yet.

Just checked the master and found the original patch is reverted. I'm ok for it, but think it is still valuable to update the status.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list