[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavfi/telecine: Mark telecined frames as interlaced

[Andriy Gelman]

On Sun, 05. Apr 02:05, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 01:02 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:40 Uhr schrieb James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/3/2020 6:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > > > Am Fr., 3. Apr. 2020 um 23:19 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Attached patch marks actually telecined frames as interlaced,
> > > > >> other frames as progressive.
> > > > >
> > > > > New patch with changes to fate attached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please comment, Carl Eugen
> > > >
> > > > Those yadif tests look wrong. The patch shouldn't affect them.
> > >
> > > Clearly, thank you!
> > >
> > > New patch attached, it should now only change the telecined
> > > frames and leave the other frames as they are, the setfield
> > > filter can be used to force a progressive setting for them.
> >
> > New patch attached that also sets top_field_first
> 
> Which had the effect that fate is correct again, new patch attached.
> 

FYI
Currently patchwork does some filtering on the subject line to understand when
an attachment in a reply-to message is a new version of a patch. 

If you would like patchwork to treat the attachment as a new version, then
pls remove the "Re: " in the subject line of the reply message. This will create
a new entry for the patch.
Otherwise the reply is treated as part of the existing thread. 

Thanks,
-- 
Andriy