[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] tests/fate/filter-video: add fate pixfmts test for lut3d
Paul B Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Wed Oct 30 10:37:06 EET 2019
On 10/30/19, Limin Wang <lance.lmwang at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:22:52AM +0800, lance.lmwang at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang at gmail.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 3 +++
>> tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-lut3d | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-lut3d
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
>> index 9e6351be3e..53e9def176 100644
>> --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
>> +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
>> @@ -678,6 +678,9 @@ fate-filter-pixfmts-kerndeint: CMD = pixfmts ""
>> "tinterlace=interleave_top,"
>> FATE_FILTER_PIXFMTS-$(CONFIG_LUT_FILTER) += fate-filter-pixfmts-lut
>> fate-filter-pixfmts-lut: CMD = pixfmts
>> "c0=2*val:c1=2*val:c2=val/2:c3=negval+40"
>>
>> +FATE_FILTER_PIXFMTS-$(CONFIG_LUT_FILTER) += fate-filter-pixfmts-lut3d
>> +fate-filter-pixfmts-lut3d: CMD = pixfmts
>> +
>> FATE_FILTER_PIXFMTS-$(CONFIG_NULL_FILTER) += fate-filter-pixfmts-null
>> fate-filter-pixfmts-null: CMD = pixfmts
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-lut3d
>> b/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-lut3d
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..56c294fa86
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-lut3d
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +0bgr 5087cdbb3da0d014de02fda75618f278
>> +0rgb 9ccde40a857919017558353aaecfa5de
>> +abgr 0505ae7e852cf32ce9e2a0fc06462f48
>> +argb 77e7baba2d8b4389267a2ecb67662c15
>> +bgr0 cded4da42263da5bf0153e8bad09a0de
>> +bgr24 fef9ee2e37a1d5c1787ffb3ed5dcc3bf
>> +bgr48le 39fe9f41285f3325833d28ce1611d586
>
> For mips, it'll print out bgr48be, but fate-filter-pixfmts-lut is *le
> always, I haven't see any special process
> for lut, please give comment if you're expert for the pixfmts test.
I'm expert for pixfmts test, and your patch is invalid.
>
>> +bgra 3433cdbdf07abbd8af4698a3b7a1a189
>> +bgra64le 8f33508d6c0362df83296513ebee3a2d
>> +gbrap 4227379340c3d822dd6c59263b170972
>> +gbrap10le 90721f63d6e3d5d7a6bafcefdca5151d
>> +gbrap12le e1eee70df0c2578937dcd7a90e22f4b7
>> +gbrap16le 2fd82ec30573ed65fa23c4d1c150d596
>> +gbrp e615c8ea180a0358261953812df0aa3d
>> +gbrp10le d61faad75dbd7cbb0271b47fa33d714e
>> +gbrp12le 90c4ec04807bbfbe194eddcc8d7bcb2a
>> +gbrp14le c424158744f9e16dbfcf00c66ba651f9
>> +gbrp16le 8ccb63f9407cae03b2e061ed1249127d
>> +gbrp9le 4a267ed7c6535c8829e83e35c51df6bf
>> +rgb0 545f5c4e4a7b7f3e61373149db0b932a
>> +rgb24 aec4f0a1954823de17024383d6401b75
>> +rgb48le 1d1e5a1849ed3c326961184bb2f45400
>> +rgba ecd543877779d03bded1e8209f5bdea5
>> +rgba64le b26c35d221b026304db46014260ed1db
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list