[FFmpeg-devel] change for ROI interface/document

[Guo, Yejun]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 10:08 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Cc: Mark Thompson <sw at jkqxz.net>
> Subject: RE: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] lavu/frame: Expand ROI
> documentation
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> > Guo, Yejun
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 2:45 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] lavu/frame: Expand ROI
> > documentation
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Mark Thompson
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 8:18 AM
> > > To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] lavu/frame: Expand ROI
> > > documentation
> > >
> > > Clarify and add examples for the behaviour of the quantisation offset,
> > > and define how multiple ranges should be handled.
> > > ---
> > >  libavutil/frame.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Maybe we can first refine and push the first two patches?
> 
> hello, just a kind reminder,
> since it is an interface change, it would be better to handle the first two
> patches earlier.

imho, we'd better make the change before the ffmpeg 4.2 release (Michael mentioned the probable time next week).

> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> > ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".