[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: require transparency about sponshorships.

Nicolas George george at nsup.org
Sun Jan 13 19:56:35 EET 2019

James Almer (12019-01-13):
> A temporal ban for first time offenders and such could maybe work. But
> then we're back to the CoC discussion that went nowhere.

And look who blocked this...

> And again, you think requesting the disclosure of the incentive behind
> the patch will make a difference on the behavior of a person questioned
> for ignoring reviews?

So you think they would outright lie about their sponsorships?

I am more optimistic: I believe there is a core of honesty and
attachment to good code in most contributors, and that making them aware
of their bias would be enough to convince them to try to do better, at
least a start.

But if you think they are actually dishonest and neglectful, then I
concur with your conclusions: they have no business having commit


  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20190113/77d5db99/attachment.sig>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list