[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: require transparency about sponshorships.
george at nsup.org
Sun Jan 13 18:29:00 EET 2019
James Almer (12019-01-13):
> (1) is not an issue,
It is an issue because it makes the rest possible. After all, people
whose main motivation is code quality would want their code reviewed.
> (2) and (3) are the issue, and depending on the
> developer's reaction at reviews and request for fixes, it should result
> in the removal of commit rights.
I was not ready to go that way, but since you put that on the tale, be
aware that I will hold you to it.
> the recent patch by Paul that prompted this abomination of a patch fit
> the above criteria?
If they happened in the future and not in the past (decisions should not
be retroactive), I would consider this:
(I notice that you did call him out on the second, and I appreciate it)
to count as strikes one and two.
> And (5) is completely irrelevant for the above. Bad code is bad code,
> and bad behavior is bad behavior, regardless of the incentive behind it.
I am not very surprised to see technical types ignoring sociological
evidence, but it is saddening.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel