[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: require transparency about sponshorships.
george at nsup.org
Sun Jan 13 17:06:42 EET 2019
James Almer (12019-01-13):
> If no one challenges, then either no one looked at it, or everyone that
> looked at it was fine with it. Where is the issue then?
If nobody looked, how can we know there is no obvious security issue?
> You're looking for a solution for a problem that doesn't exist.
Tell that to the people who have been insulted for raising valid
objections on sponsored work.
> Sponsored work has been disclosed before without any kind of guidelines.
Not all of it.
> If you want something people will not NAK on sight, write one where you
> require to double check who the copyright belongs to in case of
> sponsorship to prevent wrong commit authorship, and to *suggest* stating
> sponsorship status if the copyright ultimately belongs to the developer.
> Drop any mention about remuneration disclosure if it was not public to
> begin with, and then it can be discussed.
Re-read the rationale in the proposed patch: copyright is only one of
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel