[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/5] avcodec/cbs_h2645: add helper macros for signed values

[James Almer]

On 4/16/2019 8:24 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 00:01, James Almer wrote:
>> On 4/16/2019 7:57 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
>>> On 15/04/2019 22:17, James Almer wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c b/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>>>> index e74f8dce81..a205293b3c 100644
>>>> --- a/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>>>> +++ b/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>>>> @@ -255,6 +255,8 @@ static int cbs_write_se_golomb(CodedBitstreamContext *ctx, PutBitContext *pbc,
>>>>  #define flag(name) u(1, name, 0, 1)
>>>>  #define ue(name, range_min, range_max) \
>>>>          xue(name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>>>> +#define i(width, name, range_min, range_max) \
>>>> +        xi(width, name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>>>
>>> I know it's right, but defining "i" as a macro feels like a pretty terrible idea in C :P
>>
>> Eh, i guess :p. It at least didn't blow up here.
>>
>> What would be best? s? su like in cbs_av1? Something else?
> 
> To clarify, I do think it's correct to call it i() here to match the H.26[45] standards.
> 
> Any other option would probably be more confusing.  And, as you note, it actually doesn't blow up because none of the many uses of i are followed by (.
> 
> - Mark

Alright, left as is then, and pushed.

Thanks!