[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] avformat: add fields to AVProgram/AVStream for PMT change tracking
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Sun May 20 22:55:02 EEST 2018
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 11:37:22AM -0700, Aman Gupta wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/19/2018 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Aman Gupta wrote:
> > >> From: Aman Gupta <aman at tmm1.net>
> > >>
> > >> These fields will allow the mpegts demuxer to expose details about
> > >> the PMT/program which created the AVProgram and its AVStreams.
> > >>
> > >> In mpegts, a PMT which advertises streams has a version number
> > >> which can be incremented at any time. When the version changes,
> > >> the pids which correspond to each of it's streams can also change.
> > >>
> > >> Since ffmpeg creates a new AVStream per pid by default, an API user
> > >> needs the ability to (a) detect when the PMT changed, and (b) tell
> > >> which AVStream were added to replace earlier streams.
> > >>
> > >> This has been a long-standing issue with ffmpeg's handling of mpegts
> > >> streams with PMT changes, and I found two related patches in the wild
> > >> that attempt to solve the same problem.
> > >>
> > >> The first is in MythTV's ffmpeg fork, where they added a
> > >> void (*streams_changed)(void*); to AVFormatContext and call it from
> > >> their fork of the mpegts demuxer whenever the PMT changes.
> > >>
> > >> The second was proposed by XBMC in
> > >> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2012-December/135036.html,
> > >> where they created a new AVMEDIA_TYPE_DATA stream with id=0 and
> > >> attempted to send packets to it whenever the PMT changed.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Aman Gupta <aman at tmm1.net>
> > >> ---
> > >> doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++
> > >> libavformat/avformat.h | 8 ++++++++
> > >> libavformat/utils.c | 1 +
> > >> libavformat/version.h | 2 +-
> > >> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> > >> index befa58c84a..a592073ca5 100644
> > >> --- a/doc/APIchanges
> > >> +++ b/doc/APIchanges
> > >> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ libavutil: 2017-10-21
> > >>
> > >> API changes, most recent first:
> > >>
> > >> +2018-05-xx - xxxxxxxxxx - lavf 58.15.100 - avformat.h
> > >> + Add pmt_version field to AVProgram
> > >> + Add program_num, pmt_version, pmt_stream_idx to AVStream
> > >> +
> > >> 2018-05-xx - xxxxxxxxxx - lavf 58.14.100 - avformat.h
> > >> Add AV_DISPOSITION_STILL_IMAGE
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/libavformat/avformat.h b/libavformat/avformat.h
> > >> index 6dce88fad5..ade918f99c 100644
> > >> --- a/libavformat/avformat.h
> > >> +++ b/libavformat/avformat.h
> > >> @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ typedef struct AVStream {
> > >> */
> > >> int stream_identifier;
> > >>
> > >> + /**
> > >> + * Details of the MPEG-TS program which created this stream.
> > >> + */
> > >> + int program_num;
> > >> + int pmt_version;
> > >> + int pmt_stream_idx;
> > >> +
> > >> int64_t interleaver_chunk_size;
> > >> int64_t interleaver_chunk_duration;
> > >>
> > >
> > > These are added below the "All fields below this line are not part of
> > the public API."
> > > This contradicts the addition to APIChanges
> >
> > If these don't need to be accessed by the API user then I'd rather keep
> > them here than moving them to the public section. Just remove the
> > APIChanges entry.
> > Same thing with the AVStream pmt_version field. If direct access is not
> > needed for it, then it should be moved below the public notice.
> >
> > These fields seem pretty specific to one demuxer so ideally they
> > shouldn't be public in case changes to them and the implementation are
> > ever needed.
>
>
> Yes they are specific to mpegts, and also may need to change in the future.
>
> These were intended to be used in conjunction with the existing
> AVStream.stream_identifier, which is also mpegts-specific. It appears in
> the private section, even though the field is only written to from mpegts.c
> and never used anywhere else in avformat. Clearly it was added to be used
> by API users, but it too lives in the private section.
>
> It seems like the best course forward is to remove APIchanges entries. The
> fields are there if a user really needs to access them, but they are
> considered private which means we can change them later if need be to
> evolve support. In this case, should I revert the version bump as well? Or
> is that still required since the ABI changed (even though it was in the
> private section).
Iam not sure i understand what you suggest but if a field is added in the
private section then a user app cannot reliably access it. (It would move
in memory the next time a public field is added)
Also if the ABI changes in the future then any users using the API could break
(depending on the exact change)
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20180520/b4f904c7/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list