[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] cmdutils: use new iteration APIs
Josh de Kock
josh at itanimul.li
Thu Mar 22 13:19:08 EET 2018
On 2018/03/22 10:29, Nicolas George wrote:
> Josh de Kock (2018-03-22):
>> I have -ffunroll'd the macros for you Nicolas.
>
> That is not what I asked. The macros were just a way of making the poor
> API a little less poor, but the problem still remains:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_AVDEVICE
>> + opaque = 0;
>> + if (muxdemuxers != SHOW_DEMUXERS) {
>> + while ((ofmt = av_outdev_iterate(&opaque))) {
>> + if ((!name || strcmp(ofmt-> name, name) < 0) && strcmp(ofmt-> name, last_name) > 0) {
>> + name = ofmt - > name;
>> + long_name = ofmt - > long_name;
>> + is_ofmt = 1;
>> }
>> - if (name && strcmp(ifmt->name, name) == 0)
>> - decode = 1;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + opaque = 0;
>> + if (muxdemuxers != SHOW_MUXERS) {
>> + while ((ifmt = av_indev_iterate(&opaque))) {
>> + if ((!name || strcmp(ifmt-> name, name) < 0) && strcmp(ifmt-> name, last_name) > 0) {
>> + name = ifmt - > name;
>> + long_name = ifmt - > long_name;
>> + is_ifmt = 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +#endif
>
> There is a separate loop for devices, and I strongly oppose to that. Fix
> your API so that all (de)muxer-like components are returned in a single
> loop.
>
> Regards,
>
I strongly oppose using the same loop. Separating devices' iteration is
one of the first steps to separating lavf from lavd.
--
Josh
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list