[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] reitnerlace - tinterlace-like filter under LGPL
Paul B Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 14:53:11 EET 2018
On 3/5/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-03-05 12:37 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com>:
>> On 3/5/18, Vasile Toncu <vasile.toncu at tremend.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the review. I've made changes according to your guidance.
>>> It would be great to know if the community will go on with our intention
>>> of adding reinterlace as a alternative for tinterlace.
>>> That being said, here is the new patch.
>> As already said, this is not acceptable.
>> There is no point in having 2 filters with near same funcionality.
> If you consider the new filter ok, the existing filter will be removed
> in the same push. I believe sending only the new filter makes
> reviewing easier.
I'm ok with that, but next commits that do that and also do rename are
I'm also not sure can reinterlace filter be cosidered really safe from
it does not use any old GPL code.
Also bunch of stuff it does is trivial, both new and old GPL code so I
should care about its license.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel