[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2] doc/bitstream_filters: correct dump_extra bsfs docs.

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Sun Mar 4 00:16:02 EET 2018


On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:10:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/3/2018 6:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:16:11AM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote:
> >>
> > 
> >>  bitstream_filters.texi |   11 ++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> 27c05404d9fabe5065e418c4cc09629d53aee1a1  0001-doc-bitstream_filters-correct-dump_extra-bsfs-docs.patch
> >> From 0a0a10824511ef9d5b3c49ee652a918603841826 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao at intel.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:53:05 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH V2] doc/bitstream_filters: correct dump_extra bsfs docs.
> >>
> >> Update dump_extra bit stream filter docs to follow current
> >> code implement.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao at intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Steven Liu <lq at onvideo.cn>
> >> ---
> >>  doc/bitstream_filters.texi | 11 ++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > i  hoped a little that the a option could one day be
> > cleanly restored in the implementation.
> > but keeping the docs incorrect is not helping
> 
> You mean adding it as it's defined in the removed portion of the doxy
> from this patch (local_header flag2)?
> Sounds like a better idea, as it would help replace the
> av_parser_change() call in ffmpeg.c with this bsf. I'll take a look.

yes

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either
wrong or dead since a long time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20180303/5d116dfd/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list