[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] rtsp: rename certain options after a deprecation period
nfxjfg at googlemail.com
Sat Jan 27 04:38:37 EET 2018
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:26:20 -0300
James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/26/2018 11:23 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 02:25:49 +0100
> > Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:52:19AM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 00:21:14 +0100
> >>> Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> 2018-01-26 0:00 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> I'd also like to point out that it _did_ happen in the past that
> >>> Michael went off tangents in patch reviews and asked for unreasonable
> >>> extra work because of minor issues.
> >> Ive written a huge number of reviews over the years, and i certainly
> >> did what you claim above in one of these many reviews. Not in the case
> >> you refer here to though. And if it happens, that a unreasonable request
> >> is made, discussion is whats needed.
> >> In fact many developers have made requests that others have found
> >> unreasonable. Many if not most of the more active developers have.
> >> Its not a uncommon source of long discussions.
> > And so we're having a long discussion again. You could just have left
> > it alone.
> Then drop it, the lot of you. Stop replying, throwing contradicting
> accusations in every direction, and let this thread die already.
> Nothing, absolutely nothing good will come out of this if you keep going.
I'm just defending myself. I don't want to be accused of throwing
around baseless accusations. That includes your post too.
There are _real_ issues and they will come up again and again if we
don't solve them. Pretending they don't exist isn't a solution.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel