[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec: remove anatoliy prores encoder
nfxjfg at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 26 14:49:15 EEST 2018
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:39:56 +0200
Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-04-26 13:34 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com>:
> > On 4/26/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2018-04-26 13:17 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <josh at itanimul.li>:
> >>> On 2017/06/26 15:09, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >>>> Rationale:
> >>>> - Slower then other encoder
> >>>> - Less configurable
> >>>> - Does not support alpha profile
> >>>> - Does not set interlaced flag
> >>>> - Worse output quality
> >>>> - No need for 2 encoders
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com>
> >>> Is there any reason this was not pushed?
> >>> I can't seem to see any argument against it.
> >> It was shown in the past that this encoder is faster,
> >> more efficient and produces better quality.
> > Why are you not telling real truth?
> This is surprisingly rude:
> I am always trying to tell the truth, one of the things
> that make me less happy about contributing here is
> both that I am not allowed to write the truth anymore.
What would those truths be? Note: insults are not truths.
> Anyway: In the discussion about adding one of the
> features you mention above, tests were posted that
> showed this encoder to produce better (objective,
> with all its disadvantages) quality using measurably
> less cycles.
> > None of your claims are really true.
> Given how much you embarrassed us in the prores
> discussion, I wonder why you make this claim;-)
That is surprisingly rude.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel