[FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.5 / 4.0

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Thu Apr 19 01:40:21 EEST 2018


On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:55:09PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 4/18/18, wm4 <nfxjfg at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:15:47 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:09:41PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> > <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >> > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 02:04:43PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:53:08AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 02:50:08AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > > Hi
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Its 4 months since 3.4 was branched so its time for a new major
> >> > >> > > release
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Is 4.0 or 3.5 preferred ?
> >> > >> > > Any name suggestions ?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > If there are no objections i will likely make that release in the
> >> > >> > > next weeks
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > more time has passed than intended ...
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > what issues do remain that need to be fixed before the release ?
> >> > >> > I see fate.ffmpeg.org is not looking that well (compared to most
> >> > >> > releases in the past) i remember this being pretty much green
> >> > >> > longer ago
> >> > >> > do people want these to be fixed before the release ?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ok, so, my plan is to create a release/4.0 branch from master in the
> >> > >> next
> >> > >> 24-48 hours unless theres some issue brought to my attention (CC me
> >> > >> just to
> >> > >> be sure if theres an issue)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> then wait 2 days or so and backport any newly found bugfixes to
> >> > >> release/4.0
> >> > >> and then make the release finally
> >> > >>
> >> > >> delays at any point are possible due to issues, lack of time or
> >> > >> other.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> as name i think kierans suggestion of Wu would make sense. IIRC we
> >> > >> had
> >> > >> no name suggested by more than 1 developer. Please correct me if i
> >> > >> miscounted i did only briefly re-check the mails in the thread.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > release/4.0 branched
> >> > > next is the release in a few days.
> >> > > If theres something i should wait for please say so and CC me
> >> > > also please backport all bugfixes to 4.0
> >> >
> >> > I have two more fixes that should really go in 4.0, one is the
> >> > tls_schannel fix that I plan to push soon (I'm the author of that
> >> > module, so unless someone says otherwise soon), and the MSVC configure
> >> > breakage introduced in the last 2 days.
> >> > Not sure when you planned to tag, but hopefully both of those are
> >> > resolved by tomorrow afternoon.
> >>
> >> well i had a bad headache today and iam a bit behind now with stuff
> >> so i likely wont be ready before tomorrow evening either.
> >
> > Please also wait with the release until we've sorted out the general
> > avio EOF mess.
> 

> No, that need to wait 5.0

+1

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its going to go on
forever, its just that you wont like living in it. -- Hiranya Peiri
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20180419/f9f9a8c4/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list