[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] libavformat/avio: retry_transfer_wrapper: don't treat 0 as EOF

[James Almer]

On 10/14/2017 2:22 PM, Daniel Kučera wrote:
> 2017-10-14 19:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kučera <daniel.kucera at gmail.com>:
>> 2017-10-14 17:46 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>:
>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Daniel Kučera wrote:
>>>> breaks fate-indeo3-2
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You need to apply the whole set. It passed all fate tests on my machine.
>>>
>>> I applied the whole set and bisected to find which patch caused the
>>> failure
>>>
>>> also the i-th patch of a set must pass fate with it and the 0th to ith
>>> patches applied, otherwise there would be checkouts that fail some tests
>>>
>>
>> So should I reorder them and post again?
>>
>>
> 
> What if they don't pass fate in any order? should I post them as one patch?

If one patch introduces a problem that gets fixed by a subsequent patch
then yes, both should be squashed into one to make sure the problem is
never introduced.

The idea is that no patch/commit on its own should generate a fate
failure of any kind, as it would make bisecting unrelated future issues
harder.