[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv6 4/4] libavcodec: v4l2: add support for v4l2 mem2mem codecs
Jorge Ramirez
jorge.ramirez-ortiz at linaro.org
Tue Aug 29 16:11:55 EEST 2017
On 08/25/2017 05:35 PM, wm4 wrote:
>> +static inline void set_pts(V4L2Buffer *out, int64_t pts)
>> +{
>> + if (pts == AV_NOPTS_VALUE) {
>> + /* invalid timestamp: not sure how to handle this case */
>> + out->timestamp.tv_sec = 0;
>> + out->timestamp.tv_usec = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + AVRational v4l2_timebase = { 1, 1000000 };
>> + int64_t v4l2_pts = av_rescale_q(pts, out->context->time_base, v4l2_timebase);
>> + out->timestamp.tv_sec = v4l2_pts / INT64_C(1000000);
>> + out->timestamp.tv_usec = v4l2_pts % INT64_C(1000000);
>> + }
>> +}
> Why does it require a fixed timebase? A decoder shouldn't even look at
> the timestamps, it should only pass them though. Also, not using DTS
> will make it a nightmare to support containers like avi.
>
> I suspect the decoder tries to "fix" timestamps, or maybe even does
> something particularly bad like reordering frames by timestamps. This
> is NOT something that should be in a kernel API.
>
> (FFmpeg native decoders_and_ hwaccels pass through both PTS and DTS,
> and don't touch their values.)
>
ok I will just pass through the dts/pts and return them unmodified for
decoding and retest.
what about for encoding? should I just read the pts from the driver,
rescale it back to time_base and set both pts&&dts on the returned
packet to the this same value?
after this I think I am ready to post v7 with all the review comments
addressed so thanks a lot for all the responses!
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list