[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libavcodec: Add support for QSV screen capture plugin

Alexander Bilyak bilyak.alexander at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 16:25:36 EEST 2017


Hi, Mark,
I am not satisfied with this approach neither.
But I thought it would be better this way since we have already
well-written code for encoder/decoder, surface management, etc. Sharing
this functions between lavc and lavd will be a big mess up and produce a
lot of avpriv_ functions (I've tried). And I don't know if copying the same
code twice (at least for surface management and initialization) would be
better than adding pseudo-decoder.

So I sent this patch just to show the idea, of course it is not final
version. I was curious if pseudo-decoder will be acceptable or not.

Also your remarks 1 and 2 are true. But as I said: this is just concept
version.

I don't have idea if there could be any need to pass external device in. If
you want a screen capture device - what could you wish to do with it's
hardware context? Settings like mouse capture (that is not working at all
in QSV lol) or specifying desired window/area could be set via usual text
options.
If someone REALLY want to provide external device context (or get it out
from created context) - we could add some callback parameter with pointer
to context memory (I've seen something like this in VLC long time ago).
This is bad, BAD approach, but as you mentioned - lavf won't let us do
anything else.

As far as I understood this "decoder" from Intel makes copy of backbuffer
to system memory. As it consumes a lot less CPU than GDI (like half) and
Intel Media Performance shows me some small load on MFX - I THINK that GPU
is responsible for copying and converting. But this are just my thoughts,
that's all as no info is provided in documentation.

Many thanks for reviewing the code,

- Alex


2017-08-14 14:26 GMT+02:00 Mark Thompson <sw at jkqxz.net>:

> On 11/08/17 10:10, Alexander Bilyak wrote:
> > Intel QSV SDK provide screen capture plugin starting from API ver 1.17
> > as runtime loadable plugin for QSV decoder.
> >
> > * add API version selection while initialization of QSV context
> > (default is still 1.1 for usual encoding/decoding)
> > ---
> >  configure                  |   2 +
> >  libavcodec/Makefile        |   1 +
> >  libavcodec/allcodecs.c     |   1 +
> >  libavcodec/qsv.c           |   6 +-
> >  libavcodec/qsv_internal.h  |   2 +-
> >  libavcodec/qsvdec.c        |  12 ++-
> >  libavcodec/qsvdec.h        |   5 +
> >  libavcodec/qsvdec_screen.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +++++++++++++++
> >  libavcodec/qsvenc.c        |   3 +-
> >  9 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 libavcodec/qsvdec_screen.c
>
> I'm not convinced that adding this as a hacked-up pseudo-decoder is really
> the best approach.
>
> It would, I think, be straightforward to put this in lavd completely
> standalone.  The common code you are actually using there is:
> * Session initialisation - this should be trivial, since you have no
> device or external frames anyway.
> * The actual decode function - this contains a lot of additional
> trickiness (packets, asynchronicity, queueing) which you don't want.  A
> simpler form which just fetches one frame would feel better.  This should
> also be able to avoid the second copy to the output packet.
>
> Some other thoughts:
> * If this is only available in a higher API version then you will need a
> configure test for those headers.
> * Does this only support NV12 capture?  In many cases RGB is more useful
> (or at least some YUV 4:4:4 which doesn't do nasty things to thin coloured
> lines).
> * Is having an externally-provided device (hw_device_ctx) ever useful?
> The lavd implementation doesn't have any way to pass a device in (since
> lavf can't).
> * Do you happen to know how it actually works?  (Presumably it's reading
> surfaces used for scanout on the GPU side somehow; who does the copy and
> colour conversion?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Mark
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list