[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dca: add new fate tests based on the dcadec-samples test suite

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Tue Feb 2 12:26:18 CET 2016


On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:53:29AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:34:12PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  tests/fate/dca.mak                       | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_16_192_768_0   |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_16_192_768_1   |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_24_48_768      |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_24_48_none     |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_48_768_0    |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_48_768_1    |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_96_768      |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_x96_51_24_96_1509 |  1 +
> >> >>  tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_xch_61_24_48_768  |  1 +
> >> >>  10 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_16_192_768_0
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_16_192_768_1
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_24_48_768
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_51_24_48_none
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_48_768_0
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_48_768_1
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_71_24_96_768
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_x96_51_24_96_1509
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dca-xll_xch_61_24_48_768
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > As an extra info, all new samples and the pcm references for the lossy
> >> > tests are in total only 1MB, so quite tiny for 19 new fate tests that
> >> > greatly increase coverage.
> >> >
> >>
> >> For even more coverage, could also add downmix tests using all the
> >> existing samples (down to 6 and 2 respectively).
> >
> > consideing this is just 1-2mb or something, iam in favor of it
> > didnt test though
> >
> 
> Adding a bunch of identical pcm files seems rather wasteful, so I'm
> currently favoring the approach of simply testing both downmix modes
> on all of the XLL files which only have a md5 check and not a
> reference file, and testing downmix on a few lossy samples where its
> actually doing something.

sure, i didnt realize there would be duplicates ...


> That should still cover a wide variety of code paths.
> 
> -  Hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The misfortune of the wise is better than the prosperity of the fool.
-- Epicurus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20160202/455b01cb/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list