[FFmpeg-devel] Support master branch of OpenJPEG and Grok J2K codecs
boxerab at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 14:01:35 CEST 2016
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 05:31:25PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> > Here is a small patch to get FFmpeg working with both OpenJPEG master and
> > Grok master, for J2K support. The comment on the commit has all of the
> > details; the main change is to remove the OPJ_STATIC flag from configure,
> > so that FFmpeg can be configured with a dynamic build of both codecs.
> > I also want to reiterate that because FFmpeg can be distributed under GPL
> > v3, and Grok is licensed under the AGPL, there are no licensing issues
> > regarding distributing FFmpeg together with Grok.
> FFmpeg support a wide varity of network protools, from low level
> tcp&udp to higher level http, ftp, rtp, rtsp, rtmp, mms, ...
> the AGPL requires "if you modify the Program, your modified version must
> prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer
> network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to
> receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the
> Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some
> standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software."
> yet you here suggest to link AGPL software to GPL where the GPL sw
> will not offer any source though any of its quite numerous network
> Iam no lawyer so i dont know if you can do that or not but
> either the combination needs to offer source code through its network
> protocols or you just suggested to circumvent your own licenses main
The GPL v3 code would continue to be bound by GPL v3,(no need to distribute
source if connected over network) and the AGPL
code would continue to be bound by AGPL (must distribute source if
connected over network)
I will try to get clarification from FSF.
> > Quoting from Wikipedia:
> quoting Wikipedia as well
> WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL OPINIONS
> Wikipedia contains articles on many legal topics; however, no warranty
> whatsoever is made that any of the articles are accurate. There is
> absolutely no assurance that any statement contained in an article touching
> on legal matters is true, correct or precise. Law varies from place to
> place and it evolves over time—sometimes quite quickly. Even if a statement
> made about the law is accurate, it may only be accurate in the jurisdiction
> of the person posting the information; as well, the law may have changed,
> been modified or overturned by subsequent development since the entry was
> made on Wikipedia.
> The legal information provided on Wikipedia is, at best, of a general
> nature and cannot substitute for the advice of a licensed professional,
> i.e., by a competent authority with specialised knowledge who can apply it
> to the particular circumstances of your case. Please contact a local bar
> association, law society or similar association of jurists in your legal
> jurisdiction to obtain a referral to a competent legal professional if you
> do not have other means of contacting an attorney-at-law, lawyer, civil law
> notary, barrister or solicitor.
> Neither the individual contributors, system operators, developers, nor
> sponsors of Wikipedia nor anyone else connected to Wikipedia can take any
> responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or
> adopt any of the information or disinformation presented on this web site.
> Nothing on Wikipedia.org or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.,
> should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or
> otherwise engage in the practice of law.
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. --
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
More information about the ffmpeg-devel