[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Stream specifier enhancement
cus at passwd.hu
Thu Oct 29 00:03:52 CET 2015
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015, Bodecs Bela wrote:
>> It can be anything if it does not change existing behaviour, a complex
>> specifier can be split to basic specifiers without worrying about the
>> syntax of the basic specifier and if there is a well defined rule for
>> escaping special characters. Also if it is readable to the user, that
>> is a plus.
>> The exact solution can be a bit about personal taste as well, but
>> maybe something like
> I like this version. So, there would be the original case: specifier,
> and if you want to use more specifier, you should put each of them into
> parenthesis (round brackets): (specifier)(specifier)
> I think it really won't break any current code
> I think () is more readible and rarely used in specifiers. If it is ok
> for you and others I would implement it.
Ok, it's fine by me.
>> can work and is readable. Knowing that you are dealing with a complex
>> expression also means that the special characters separating the basic
>> specifiers needs escaping, I guess av_get_token can be used to get the
>> proper unescaped basic specifiers when parsing the complex one.
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> best regards,
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
More information about the ffmpeg-devel