[FFmpeg-devel] Patch: icl linker errors in cmdutils

Anshul anshul.ffmpeg at gmail.com
Sat Feb 8 20:59:16 CET 2014



Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2/8/2014 12:23 AM, Matt Oliver wrote:
>> My build chain has
>> been heavily modified which is obviously causing the differences in
>> functionality.
>
>This should have been mentioned initially. You cannot expect people to
>accept
>what amounts to hacks/workarounds for your custom setup, without even
>mentioning
>it is custom.
>
>> Ill see what I can do about finding an exact configure line
>> that will be break compilation on a fresh install but that will
>require
>> reverting a whole bunch of changes.
>
>It's a simple principle: I am not going to accept a patch to fix part
>of the
>code I helped write based purely on someone's hearsay.
>
>> I understand that because I submitted this patch as a fix to a linker
>error
>> that you are refusing to accept it purely on whether you can
>reproduce the
>> error. 
>
>If we accepted every patch based purely on hearsay we would have
>amassed a lot
>of crap over the years.
>
>> My "shoddy" info wasnt a deliberate attempt to be vague I just
>> figured that for such a simple patch that obviously didnt break
>anything it
>> could be applied with minimal effort without wasting anyones time.
>
>I never said it was deliberate.
>
>> So on a
>> philosophical note If this patch had instead been submitted as
>"Optimize by
>> removing unnecessary if(0)/if(1) in cmdutils" would it have been more
>> likely to have been accepted.
>
>Nope. Probably less likely, since we rely on DCE as a matter of
>principle and
>consistency. It wouldn't be removed as an "optimization".
>
>> Relying on a compiler to remove unneeded code
>> is generally not a good idea especially when its so easy to remove it
>> yourself.
>
>The fact is we do. Everywhere. Consistently.
>
>> The fact that it can also fix linker errors could just be
>> considered a bonus.
>
>Your philosophy differs with ours with regards to relying on DCE,
>so it's not a "bonus"; it's the only point of the patch.
>
>- Derek
>_______________________________________________
>ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Derek, sry for lame question
Does dce mean distributed computing environment.

-Anshul


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list