[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/5] fate: avoid framemd5, use framecrc its faster
michaelni at gmx.at
Thu May 16 22:10:04 CEST 2013
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:35:32PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 20 floréal, an CCXXI, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > hmm, i get:
> > ffmpeg -f rawvideo md5: user 0m2.212s sys 0m0.428s
> > ffmpeg -f md5 - user 0m2.192s sys 0m0.408s
> > ffmpeg -f crc - user 0m0.356s sys 0m0.408s
> > ffmpeg -f null - user 0m0.008s sys 0m0.084s
> > aviocat md5: user 0m2.004s sys 0m0.108s
> > gnu md5sum user 0m1.272s sys 0m0.116s
> > ffadler user 0m0.164s sys 0m0.060s
> > Note, my ffmpeg tests did read the random file as if it was
> > rawvideo (which it was not) no real demuxing thus done
> > test done with a random 900mb file on sandybridge i7 4ghz
> It is hard to reproduce your runs, and the framework overhead may make
> comparison less relevant.
> I have written a small benchmark for various hash functions, I can send the
> program itself if wanted, and the results are below (the time is in cycles
> per byte).
> You will notice that OpenSSL is always faster than lavu; the difference is
> negligible for SHA-2 on x86_32, but elsewhere it is significant, and it is
> even huge for MD5 on Atom, for some reason.
under which license is the openssl code ? if its lgpl we should
consider replacing ours by the openssl code. If not borrowing its
tricks would make sense
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
-- Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel