[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/5] fate: avoid framemd5, use framecrc its faster

compn tempn at twmi.rr.com
Thu May 9 15:06:04 CEST 2013

On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:44:38 +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:39:25AM -0400, compn wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 18:24:25 +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> >Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
>> >
>> >I disagree with this, CRC can easily miss structural changes, particularly with 
>> in my tests over the years, crc has been good enough for me.
>> btw , why not just have both? make it a fate option to use crc or md5.
>> (i guess means having both crc and md5 results too)
>Overkill, and needs space in git to store both references.

we could have seperate repo, if thats even a problem.

>At least personally I'd rather have Michael go ahead with what he has,
>unless we agree on something better.

anyone check if our md5sum implementation was the fastest? is it
optimized for ssse3? yasm? can it be offloaded to gpu?


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list