[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Proved va_copy fallback for old gcc versions.
george at nsup.org
Mon Dec 30 12:24:04 CET 2013
Le decadi 10 nivôse, an CCXXII, Reimar Döffinger a écrit :
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Proved va_copy fallback for old gcc
I do not object to the patch itself (I do not know), but what does "Proved"
mean here? Is it a typo for provide?
Also, sorry to bring that up again: with Git, the recommended format of
commit messages is "context: short description[\n\nlonger description]".
A standardized format helps reading patch proposals and email commit
notifications (the context is not automatically in the subject).
Could we agree to follow that?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel