[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Proved va_copy fallback for old gcc versions.

Nicolas George george at nsup.org
Mon Dec 30 12:24:04 CET 2013

Le decadi 10 nivôse, an CCXXII, Reimar Döffinger a écrit :
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Proved va_copy fallback for old gcc
>  versions.

I do not object to the patch itself (I do not know), but what does "Proved"
mean here? Is it a typo for provide?

Also, sorry to bring that up again: with Git, the recommended format of
commit messages is "context: short description[\n\nlonger description]".
A standardized format helps reading patch proposals and email commit
notifications (the context is not automatically in the subject).

Could we agree to follow that?


  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20131230/7e219b8b/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list