[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/encoders: Add a note for x264 options that use colon

Ivan Pozdeev vano at mail.mipt.ru
Sun Nov 25 18:40:33 CET 2012


On Sunday, November 25, 2012, 7:20:31 PM, Stefano wrote:
> On date Sunday 2012-11-25 06:55:25 +0400, Ivan Pozdeev encoded:
>> fef0b37152291254cb4d0141a266f3e31279c6e9
>>  doc/encoders.texi |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/doc/encoders.texi b/doc/encoders.texi
>> index c37f256..9c7dec1 100644
>> --- a/doc/encoders.texi
>> +++ b/doc/encoders.texi
>> @@ -627,6 +627,9 @@ For example to specify libx264 encoding options with @command{ffmpeg}:
>>  ffmpeg -i foo.mpg -vcodec libx264 -x264opts keyint=123:min-keyint=20 -an out.mkv
>>  @end example
>>  

>> +For @var{filter} and @var{psy-rd} options that use ":" themselves, use "," instead.
>> +They accept it as well since long ago but this is kept undocumented for some reason.
>> +

> The context of this sentence is not very clear. I'd put the sentence
> just below the x264opts entry, something like:

> @item x264opts @var{options}
> Allow to set any x264 option, see x264 --fullhelp for a list.

> @var{options} is a list of @var{key}=@var{value} couples separated by
> ":". For @var{filter} and @var{psy-rd} options that use ":"
> themselves, use "," instead. They accept it as well since long ago but this
> is kept undocumented for some reason.

This placement makes it somewhat unclear as to which colons to replace with
commas :^). Let's consider this phrasing:

"... In @var{filter} and @var{psy-rd} options that use ":" as a
separator themselves, use "," instead. ..."


> ...

> Alternatively we may consider escaping as another possibly safer
> alternative. Also updating x264 upstream documentation may be useful.

Does it HAVE an official documentation? doc/ in its sources has nothing
and all I can see on the Web is
http://mewiki.project357.com/wiki/X264_Settings which appears to be
unofficial: the site is devoted to another piece of software, MeGUI.

Escaped character handling would add complexity that I consider
unnecessary in this perticular case.
There's one parameter though, 'cqm', that can be a file name so any
choice for a separator would potentially trouble it. Despite this, I
suggest to leave it alone until someone has real trouble with it
in accordance with YAGNI principle since this option seems to be
very rarely needed.

> Thanks.




-- 
Best regards,
 Ivan                            mailto:vano at mail.mipt.ru



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list