[FFmpeg-devel] c99wrap.exe and c99conv.exe

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Wed Nov 21 22:17:23 CET 2012


On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:58:45PM -0500, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 21/11/2012 3:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > i also do not remember hearing "all three of the authors" stating
> > that "it is supposed to be generic and any breakage in FFmpeg is
> > considered a bug in the converter"
> 
> In this thread alone, you have Ronald and myself. That's two out
> of three.
> 
> You require Martin to also comment to satisfy your worries?

You said that:
"And all three of the authors have specifically said it is supposed to be generic
 and any breakage in FFmpeg is considered a bug in the converter. On many occasions.
 Over many months. This is apparently not enough. So tell me, if it's not a trust issue,
 (as in you don't believe us), what is it?"

Iam just curious about which statements from "all three of the authors"
"On many occasions", "Over many months" you are refering to
it seems pivotal in your escalation of this thread from
a technical question into a "ohh you dont trust us" drama

iam curious if i missed some statements or if i lost some mails or
something else ?

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
dead. -- Aristotle 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20121121/ef0b451e/attachment.asc>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list