[FFmpeg-devel] New fate instances

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Tue Feb 14 17:01:14 CET 2012

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:22:40AM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> Hi,
> 'got a new box, so I'm now able to make "full" valgrind runs, and faster.
> Fate now reports a valgrind without --undef-value-errors=no (and the old
> instance is still kept).
> Since the full-valgrind instance uses the --valgrind option (can't be done
> easily for the no-undef one for various reasons), the upstream suppression
> file is honored and thus can be updated if you think some reports are
> invalids.
> I also added a --disable-avfilter and --disable-zlib (conditional build
> for these two are common in the sources) instances, but some tests can't
> be run properly. Should we make the fate tests conditionals, or should I
> just make the instance "Build only" (how am I supposed to do that BTW?
> Redefine the build() function in the config file?)
> By the way, the configuration information for the --enable-shared is
> broken on the website because of the usage of ':' (which breaks the
> split somehow). Maybe I should use another separator?

> Feel free to propose a few more configurations. I can also share the
> settings and script I use for anyone willing to add some fate instances.

open64, path scale and sunc compiler tests, and anything else that can
build ffmpeg ...

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did it is even more stupid. If everything ms did were stupid they
would be bankrupt already.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20120214/76636e66/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list