[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Trac issues policy

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:56:42AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Thursday 2011-04-28 01:48:19 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:34:18AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > how do you prefer to manage issues? Is acceptable to let the reporter
> > > close the bug (assuming she will reply in a reasonable amount of
> > > time), or Carl/the committer should do it?
> > 
> > The commiter closes, and the reporter can reopen if its not fixed.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > (I'm not even sure trac provides a notification mechanism, right now
> > > I'm used to poll it and see if people replied to my own messages, but
> > > this is not going to scale well).
> > 
> > The creator of a bug should get mails, also theres
> > ffmpeg-trac at avcodec.org
> > http://avcodec.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2011-April/thread.html
> > and theres a CC field where people can add themselfs
> 
> What about to migrate the ML to ffmpeg.org (ffmpeg-issues?), add the

ok with me (ffmpeg-trac) but i dont volunteer to do the work


> link to Contacts and subscribe it to GMane?

http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.trac

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad
people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110518/c3270197/attachment.asc>