[FFmpeg-devel] JPEG2000 decoder

rukhsana afroz rukhsana.afroz at gmail.com
Mon May 9 03:38:06 CEST 2011


On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, rukhsana afroz <rukhsana.afroz at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>   On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>wrote:
>
>>
>> The buffer no of course not but where it points does, look:
>> using  the following:
>> --- ref-src/src//libjasper/jpc/jpc_t2dec.c  2007-01-19 22:43:07.000000000
>> +0100
>> +++ src//libjasper/jpc/jpc_t2dec.c  2011-05-06 18:23:44.234826999 +0200
>> @@ -455,6 +455,7 @@
>>          jpc_pi_prcno(pi), jpc_pi_lyrno(pi))) {
>>            return -1;
>>        }
>> +       fprintf(stderr, "after decode_packet %d\n",
>>  jas_stream_getrwcount(in));
>>  ++dec->numpkts;
>>    }
>>
>>
>> --- a/libavcodec/j2kdec.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/j2kdec.c
>> @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ static int decode_packets(J2kDecoderContext *s,
>> J2kTile *tile)
>>                         if (decode_packet(s, codsty, rlevel, precno,
>> layno, qntsty->expn +
>>                                           (reslevelno ? 3*(reslevelno-1)+1
>> : 0), qntsty->nguardbits))
>>                             return -1;
>> +            av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "after decode_packet %d\n",
>> s->buf - s->buf_start);
>>                     }
>>                 }
>>             }
>>
>> for testfiles_jp2/file1.jp2 both produce:
>> after decode_packet 1704
>> after decode_packet 2016
>> after decode_packet 2351
>> after decode_packet 3187
>> after decode_packet 3937
>> after decode_packet 4759
>> after decode_packet 7837
>> after decode_packet 10571
>> after decode_packet 13450
>> after decode_packet 25287
>> after decode_packet 36233
>> after decode_packet 47325
>> after decode_packet 93349
>> after decode_packet 138118
>> after decode_packet 182075
>> after decode_packet 337323
>> after decode_packet 496033
>> after decode_packet 650676
>>
>> But for codestreams_profile1/p1_01.j2k
>> after decode_packet 181
>> after decode_packet 182
>> after decode_packet 218
>> after decode_packet 219
>> after decode_packet 260
>> after decode_packet 261
>> after decode_packet 262
>> after decode_packet 263
>> after decode_packet 264
>> after decode_packet 273
>> after decode_packet 274
>> after decode_packet 281
>> after decode_packet 282
>> after decode_packet 283
>> after decode_packet 284
>> after decode_packet 303
>> after decode_packet 304
>> after decode_packet 305
>> after decode_packet 306
>> after decode_packet 325
>> vs.
>> after decode_packet 201
>> after decode_packet 284
>> after decode_packet 351
>> after decode_packet 397
>> after decode_packet 406
>> after decode_packet 415
>> after decode_packet 424
>> after decode_packet 433
>> after decode_packet 461
>> after decode_packet 538
>> after decode_packet 683
>> after decode_packet 898
>> after decode_packet 955
>> after decode_packet 1155
>> after decode_packet 1956
>> after decode_packet 4723
>> after decode_packet 4732
>> after decode_packet 4741
>> after decode_packet 4750
>> after decode_packet 4759
>>
>> theres a error in or before the first decode_packet() call
>>
>> a possible next step is to add more av_log/printf to bisect the area
>> where the first difference happens.
>> by repeating such bisection you will find the point where a variable
>> starts to differ quickly.
>> This may then point to another variable that needs similar bisection
>> or already the bug in our code.
>>
>>
>>
>
> The problem I found in the function decode_packet. I have checked init_tile
> function. It looks apparently ok. In fact, s->buf starts differing inside
> decode_packet function. For the first packet, at the beginning of
> decode_packet function, pointer in our decoder and jasper is the same. I
> also gave printf before the process of J2K_EPH marker. I found, at this
> place, pointer starts differing even for the first packet. And therefore,
> for the rest of the packets, pointer are different as well. I found our
> decoder did not process J2K_SOP (start of pkt) marker which jasper has
> processed. SOP marker is 6 bytes. I believe, I need to check the
> decode_packet function in order to fix this bug. I also found, our decoder
> did not process many packet related markers (PPM, PPT, PLT, PLM etc.) which
> jasper has processed. The following are two patches as the evidence of my
> argument.
>
> our decode:
> @@ -495,6 +498,8 @@ static int decode_packet(J2kDecoderContext *s,
> J2kCodingStyle *codsty, J2kResLev
>  {
>      int bandno, cblkny, cblknx, cblkno, ret;
>
> +   av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_INFO, "start decode_packet %d\n", s->buf -
> s->buf_start);
> +
>      if (!(ret = get_bits(s, 1))){
>          j2k_flush(s);
>          return 0;
> @@ -539,6 +544,8 @@ static int decode_packet(J2kDecoderContext *s,
> J2kCodingStyle *codsty, J2kResLev
>      }
>      j2k_flush(s);
>
> +    av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_INFO, "before end of packet header %d\n",
> s->buf - s->buf_start);
> +
>      if (codsty->csty & J2K_CSTY_EPH) {
>          if (AV_RB16(s->buf) == J2K_EPH) {
>              s->buf += 2;
>
> our decoder's output: I found the decoder even does not go to J2K_EPH
> marker for some packets.
> start decode_packet 146
> before end of packet header 149
> start decode_packet 181
> before end of packet header 182
> start decode_packet 182
> before end of packet header 186
> start decode_packet 218
> before end of packet header 219
> start decode_packet 219
> before end of packet header 222
> start decode_packet 260
> before end of packet header 261
> start decode_packet 261
> start decode_packet 262
> start decode_packet 263
> start decode_packet 264
> before end of packet header 267
> start decode_packet 273
> start decode_packet 274
> before end of packet header 277
> start decode_packet 281
> start decode_packet 282
> start decode_packet 283
> start decode_packet 284
> before end of packet header 287
> start decode_packet 303
> start decode_packet 304
> start decode_packet 305
> start decode_packet 306
> before end of packet header 309
>
> jasper patch:
>
> --- ../../orig_jasper/jasper-1.900.1/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_t2dec.c
> 2007-01-19 13:43:07.000000000 -0800
> +++ libjasper/jpc/jpc_t2dec.c   2011-05-08 13:02:35.748666000 -0700
> @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@
>
>         /* Avoid compiler warning about possible use of uninitialized
>           variable. */
> +
> +        fprintf(stdout, "start decode_packet %d\n",
> jas_stream_getrwcount(in));
> +
>         bodylen = 0;
>
>         discard = (lyrno >= dec->maxlyrs);
> @@ -345,6 +348,8 @@
>                   (unsigned long) bodylen);
>         }
>
> +         fprintf(stdout, "before end of pkt header %d\n",
> jas_stream_getrwcount(in));
> +
>         if (cp->csty & JPC_COD_EPH) {
>                 if (jpc_dec_lookahead(pkthdrstream) == JPC_MS_EPH) {
>                         if (!(ms = jpc_getms(pkthdrstream, dec->cstate))) {
>
>
> jasper output:
>
> start decode_packet 146
> before end of pkt header 158
> start decode_packet 201
> before end of pkt header 219
> start decode_packet 284
> before end of pkt header 294
> start decode_packet 351
> before end of pkt header 364
> start decode_packet 397
> before end of pkt header 404
> start decode_packet 406
> before end of pkt header 413
> start decode_packet 415
> before end of pkt header 422
> start decode_packet 424
> before end of pkt header 431
> start decode_packet 433
> before end of pkt header 442
> start decode_packet 461
> before end of pkt header 476
> start decode_packet 538
> before end of pkt header 555
> start decode_packet 683
> before end of pkt header 700
> start decode_packet 898
> before end of pkt header 910
> start decode_packet 955
> before end of pkt header 983
> start decode_packet 1155
> before end of pkt header 1198
> start decode_packet 1956
> before end of pkt header 2047
> start decode_packet 4723
> before end of pkt header 4730
> start decode_packet 4732
> before end of pkt header 4739
> start decode_packet 4741
> before end of pkt header 4748
> start decode_packet 4750
> before end of pkt header 4757
>
>  --
>

I think, I will have to modify decode_packets and decode_function of our
decoder. Once I am done, I will post patch here. If you have any suggestion,
please let me know.


>  --
>
Rukhsana Ruby
Phd Student
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
The University of British Columbia
============================


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list