[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] DNxHD 10-bit support v5

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:44:23PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:18:29PM +0000, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After being distracted by other things for a while, I am back trying to get my 10-bit DNxHD patches accepted.
> > I've prepared a new version of my patches.  This one is much less intrusive than the previous ones.  In particular, it touches neither MpegEncContext nor DSPContext.  Please review.
> > 
> > Apply the renaming patch first, then the other one.
> 
> Applied both locally, will push

they change the regression test checksums, thus not pushed yet.
Please either explain why the change is correct or fix the code if it
is not correct. thx

--- /home/michael/ffmpeg-git/ffmpeg/tests/ref/vsynth1/dnxhd_1080i  2011-06-07 17:56:53.838507600 +0200
+++ tests/data/regression/vsynth1/dnxhd_1080i   2011-06-10 22:06:57.278506331 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 34949ea38da2cf6a8406ad600ad95cfa *./tests/data/vsynth1/dnxhd-1080i.mov
 3031875 ./tests/data/vsynth1/dnxhd-1080i.mov
-0c651e840f860592f0d5b66030d9fa32 *./tests/data/dnxhd_1080i.vsynth1.out.yuv
+2c1617478c8b5f46d8e0a0a2fe7a9217 *./tests/data/dnxhd_1080i.vsynth1.out.yuv
 stddev:    6.29 PSNR: 32.15 MAXDIFF:   64 bytes:   760320/  7603200


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have
asymptotical amounts of data
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110610/b3ccfe2f/attachment.asc>