[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] In video_thread(), disable logging of rescaled timestamps if DEBUG is not enabled.
Måns Rullgård
mans
Sun Jan 30 19:59:14 CET 2011
Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> On date Sunday 2011-01-30 17:55:11 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
>> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
>>
>> > From d6cb9e59ced8570d7d19ad369968672d61c25703 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it>
>> > Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:35:00 +0100
>> > Subject: [PATCH] In ffplay:video_thread(), use av_dlog() for timestamp logging.
>> >
>> > Disable logging of rescaled timestamps if DEBUG is not enabled.
>> > Avoid debug log spamming with -loglevel debug.
>> > ---
>> > ffplay.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffplay.c
>> > index 840df66..edc6097 100644
>> > --- a/ffplay.c
>> > +++ b/ffplay.c
>> > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>> > const char program_name[] = "FFplay";
>> > const int program_birth_year = 2003;
>> >
>> > +//#define DEBUG
>> > //#define DEBUG_SYNC
>> >
>> > #define MAX_QUEUE_SIZE (15 * 1024 * 1024)
>> > @@ -1853,12 +1854,12 @@ static int video_thread(void *arg)
>> > }
>> >
>> > if (av_cmp_q(tb, is->video_st->time_base)) {
>> > - int64_t pts1 = pts_int;
>> > + av_unused int64_t pts1 = pts_int;
>> > pts_int = av_rescale_q(pts_int, tb, is->video_st->time_base);
>> > - av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "video_thread(): "
>> > - "tb:%d/%d pts:%"PRId64" -> tb:%d/%d pts:%"PRId64"\n",
>> > - tb.num, tb.den, pts1,
>> > - is->video_st->time_base.num, is->video_st->time_base.den, pts_int);
>> > + av_dlog(NULL, "video_thread(): "
>> > + "tb:%d/%d pts:%"PRId64" -> tb:%d/%d pts:%"PRId64"\n",
>> > + tb.num, tb.den, pts1,
>> > + is->video_st->time_base.num, is->video_st->time_base.den, pts_int);
>>
>> You could put the av_rescale_q() directly as an argument to
>> av_dlog() and avoid needing to use av_unused. I can make this change
>> if desired, no need for another patch.
>
> Do as it fits you better, thanks.
Never mind, I misread the patch. It's fine as is.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list