[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] restore git.videolan to download page

compn tempn
Mon Jan 24 17:32:19 CET 2011


On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:07:06 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:58:10PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:29:34AM -0500, compn wrote:
>> > if this looks alright to everyone i'll commit...
>> > 
>> > --- download	(revision 535)
>> > +++ download	(working copy)
>> > @@ -33,6 +33,22 @@
>> >  
>> > +<h2>FFmpeg Git (original tree) </h2>
>> > +<p>
>> > +This git repository contains MPlayer filters and is synched up to the newer tree.
>> 
>> Is it?  Will it remain synchronized?
>
>yes unless we find a compromise iam planing to indefinitly support at least
>pulling all changes from the hijaker fork (minus ones which are really bad but
>i trust you all that really bad things will be very rare or absent)
>
>
>> Why are you mentioning the filters?
>> Because they are a distinctive feature?  This looks like a fragile way to
>> characterize the differences between trees.
>
>I agree
>a few days ago i thought about something like
>"mean, ugly, dirty, featurepacked and all features and bugfixes of ffmpeg.org
> reviewed twice, once by the new maintainers and once before merging."
>(thats actually what i did so far and wasnt that hard, and the description
> can easily be changed if i run out of time to review the changes then we
> can say blindly synced)
>
>But i feared you would refuse the patch and didnt want to start unneeded
>mud spraying so i thought id think a bit more about it. But it really looks
>best to me ATM

are you ok with this then?

i just want to put the repo on the download page without much
trouble. so please no grandstanding.

-compn
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: xx2.txt
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110124/ad9cfbe6/attachment.txt>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list