[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] Equality and leader team
Sun Feb 6 19:39:28 CET 2011
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:11:45 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> and really i want to resolve the problems with this vote and make both sides
>> join forces.
>I don't think the vote is helping to achieve this ("joining forces").
this vote/idea would put everyone on the same tree ("joining forces").
it would avoid having 2 trees. maybe this isnt fork-team's goal?
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:58:53 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>Everybody is welcome and invited to join the community to work on
>FFmpeg, all past and present and future developers included.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:24:36 -0800, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
>The list, AFAIK, was chosen based on people who were experienced
>enough and active enough (and willing) to be patchmonkeys for various
>parts of ffmpeg.
>I would have no problem with anyone else joining the list if they
>satisfy those requirements.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:33:13 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
>I'd like to keep the current method for a bit longer and then see in
>retrospect what should be fixed and what had been really better.
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:31:20 -0800, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
>So we're now going to let everyone commit without review again? This
>is inviting disaster.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:08:33 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>Disclaimer: I only speak for myself.
>>>> stef,me,carl,reimar,baptiste joining commiters
>Reimar & Baptiste: can certainly be discussed, I'm in favour of it
>under certain conditions.
>Stefano: that has come up before, Stefano's work may benefit from
>being in a separate topic branch.
>Michael: I see too much hostility to consider that an option, for now.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:13:44 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>Clarify what the conditions are? (1) I'd like to do this slowly, no
>new 100 committers in the next year, or even 10. (2) I'd like you in,
>but I'd like the general direction that we've "couped" this project
>into to not change too much, for the immediate future. We have
>problems and these need fixing. Anyway, I can see how this sentence
>will lead to an enormous trollwar, so let me just summarize as
>follows: (3) we all have ideas, that's great; I think we need to focus
>on getting back to FFmpeg development before anything else. Actions
>speak louder than words. If you agree with that and will help work
>towards that common goal that I'm sure we all share, then you're
>welcome in my eyes.
forgive me if i missed any other commit talk, its a lot of mails to
More information about the ffmpeg-devel