[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] Equality and leader team

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:31:20AM -0800, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:41 AM, compn <tempn at twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:37:37 -0800, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> >>> * Disband the leader team of 7 and return commit and decission power to all
> >>> ?developers.
> >>>
> >>> Y Yes
> >>> N No
> >>
> >>What does this even mean? ?Just like all your "votes", this doesn't
> >>make any sense and does nothing but beg the question.
> >>
> >>"Disband the 7 committers", whatever that means, would mean we would
> >>have no more committers on ffmpeg at all. ?I think this is a bad idea,
> >>because without committers, there won't be any development. ?Perhaps
> >>you wanted to vote on ADDING MORE committers, instead of REMOVING
> >>them?
> >
> > i think he means 'remove the monopoly of 7, by allowing all to have
> > push/commit access again'.
> 
> So we're now going to let everyone commit without review again?  This
> is inviting disaster.

Nowhere did i say that anyone can commit without review. I want people being
equal not a leader team of 7 with special permissions. That would just
replace me by the opposition making the other half of people unhappy.
The rules for the equals are not touched by my vote. If we agree that everyone
needs to send a patch and everyone needs to get one review so be it.
(iam not really thinking the file maintainers should be required to go through
 this for their own code but that has nothing to do with this vote)


[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

DNS cache poisoning attacks, popular search engine, Google internet authority
dont be evil, please
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110205/aa439b81/attachment.pgp>