[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffmpeg.org deuglify shame
michaelni at gmx.at
Sat Apr 23 11:15:41 CEST 2011
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:40:01PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:14:26 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 03:23:09PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> > > Put violator entries in table instead of list. Fix broken links.
> > > shame | 478
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 325 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
> > > 2e897b0bbdcd57a6fdd65fc56c0ad84a2eec6b9d
> > > ffmpeg-web_deuglify_shame.patch
> > the links work fine for me, besides i was thinking of droping the
> > shame page entirely.
> For what reasons? Is the Hall of Shame effective enough in gaining
> compliance and awareness for us to keep maintaining it?
I didnt follow it precissly but ive difficulty naming a single company
that stoped violating because of that page.
> > If we keep it, i agree that a table is better than a list
> New patch attached with links reverted if we decide to keep shame.
that change should be fine (didnt look precissely, the one
applying should check it looks ok)
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not
or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and
the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel