[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Introduce av_fill_image_planesizes() (was: swscale-test: add md5 output)

Ramiro Polla ramiro.polla
Thu Sep 16 00:19:28 CEST 2010


On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:47:24PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:25:23PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Ramiro Polla <ramiro.polla at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:56:42PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> >> >> [...]
>> >> >>> @@ -93,6 +93,18 @@ int av_fill_image_pointers(uint8_t *data[4], enum PixelFormat pix_fmt, int heigh
>> >> >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? uint8_t *ptr, const int linesizes[4]);
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ?/**
>> >> >>> + * Fill plane sizes for an image with pixel format pix_fmt and height height.
>> >> >>> + *
>> >> >>> + * @param planesizes[4] array to be filled with the size for each image plane
>> >> >>> + * @param linesizes[4] the array containing the linesize for each
>> >> >>> + * plane, should be filled by av_fill_image_linesizes()
>> >> >>> + * @return the size in bytes required for the image buffer, a negative
>> >> >>> + * error code in case of failure
>> >> >>> + */
>> >> >>> +int av_fill_image_planesizes(int planesizes[4], enum PixelFormat pix_fmt, int height,
>> >> >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? const int linesizes[4]);
>> >> >>> +
>> >> >>
>> >> >> this needs to be updated to the hierachical naming
>> >> >
>> >> > Updated.
>> >>
>> >> use_* patch updated. add_* patch remains the same.
>> >
>> >> ?swscale-test.c | ? 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>> >> ?1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>> >> dc7bd92cc3ed41386e90ff1037173e271468dbed ?use_av_image_fill_planesizes_2.diff
>> >
>> > am i confused or is a patch that is supposed to simplify code making it
>> > bigger?
>>
>> It's more correct:
>> - ? ? ? ?if (dstStride[i])
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ?dst[i]= av_mallocz(dstStride[i]*dstH+16);
>> - ? ? ? ?if (dstStride[i] && !dst[i]) {
>> + ? ? ? ?if (dst_planesizes[i])
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ?dst[i]= av_mallocz(dst_planesizes[i]+16);
>> + ? ? ? ?if (dst_planesizes[i] && !dst[i]) {
>>
>> The current code makes no distinction of height for chroma planes.
>> Sure we could >>1 here and there but with av_image_fill_planesizes()
>
> that would be +1>>1

> anyway, do as you prefer if this is just about pedantic correctness

does that also go for adding the function? (updated here with minor
bump and doc/APIchanges entry)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: add_av_image_fill_planesizes_2.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3681 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100915/56eab93f/attachment.obj>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list