[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] pixdesc: use 8-bit accesses when possible in av_read/write_image_line()
Måns Rullgård
mans
Sun Sep 12 22:20:52 CEST 2010
Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> On date Sunday 2010-09-12 16:59:40 +0100, Mans Rullgard encoded:
>> This fixes out of bounds accesses for big endian formats and should be
>> a little faster.
>> ---
>> libavutil/pixdesc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavutil/pixdesc.c b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
>> index e2bc649..41bf717 100644
>> --- a/libavutil/pixdesc.c
>> +++ b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
>> @@ -54,6 +54,17 @@ void av_read_image_line(uint16_t *dst, const uint8_t *data[4], const int linesiz
>> } else {
>> const uint8_t *p = data[plane]+ y*linesize[plane] + x*step + comp.offset_plus1-1;
>>
>> + if (shift + depth <= 8) {
>> + p += !!(flags & PIX_FMT_BE);
>> + while(w--) {
>> + int val = *p;
>> + val = (val>>shift) & mask;
>> + if(read_pal_component)
>> + val= data[1][4*val + c];
>> + p+= step;
>> + *dst++= val;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> while(w--){
>> int val;
>> if(flags & PIX_FMT_BE) val= AV_RB16(p);
>> @@ -64,6 +75,7 @@ void av_read_image_line(uint16_t *dst, const uint8_t *data[4], const int linesiz
>> p+= step;
>> *dst++= val;
>> }
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>
> I'd like to avoid the code duplication.
> What about something like this:
>
> diff --git a/libavutil/pixdesc.c b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
> index e2bc649..3496787 100644
> --- a/libavutil/pixdesc.c
> +++ b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
> @@ -52,12 +52,16 @@ void av_read_image_line(uint16_t *dst, const uint8_t *data[4], const int linesiz
> *dst++= val;
> }
> } else {
> + int is_8bit = 0;
> const uint8_t *p = data[plane]+ y*linesize[plane] + x*step + comp.offset_plus1-1;
>
> + if (shift + depth <= 8) {
> + p += !!(flags & PIX_FMT_BE);
> + is_8bit = 1;
> + }
> while(w--){
> int val;
> - if(flags & PIX_FMT_BE) val= AV_RB16(p);
> - else val= AV_RL16(p);
> + val = is_8bit ? *p : flags & PIX_FMT_BE ? AV_RB16(p) : AV_RL16(p);
> val = (val>>shift) & mask;
> if(read_pal_component)
> val= data[1][4*val + c];
> ?
I don't like putting conditional things in tight loops. GCC has a
nasty habit of not optimising it properly. In this case it also makes
the whole thing look more convoluted than it really is. The code can
be reduced a little though:
while (w--) {
int val = (*p>>shift) & mask;
if (read_pal_component)
val = data[1][4*val + c];
p += step;
*dst++ = val;
}
Besides, I don't think a couple of duplicated lines are anything to
fret over.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list