[FFmpeg-devel] [FFmpeg-devel-irc] IRC log for 2010-09-30

[Jason Garrett-Glaser]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:42:55PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:56:30PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > anyway, this is really becoming a problem now slowly, you cannot every day
>> >> > attack me with lies, insults or trolling behind my back on irc and still be a
>> >> > member of the project, this is not at all a threat from me as leader
>> >>
>> >> I do not recognise you as a leader. ?A leader is someone who sets a
>> >> good example for others to follow, someone other can place their trust
>> >> in, someone who has been chosen, by voting or consensus, to be the
>> >> leader. ?A leader is not someone who shows blatant contempt for the
>> >> very rules he wants others to follow, nor is he someone who has
>> >> simply assumed the title.
>> >
>> > Iam always trying to follow the rules i expect others to follow.
>> > Its you who does break the rules continuously and claim others break them.
>> > Just your commit 1 minute ago r25286 is a good example
>> > you make whatever change you want to code actively maintained by others and
>> > even though a discussion and disagreement exists at the very time.
>> > Rule or not its expected to discuss controversal changes especially if the
>> > maintainer is against them before commiting.
>>
>> Fixing a forgotten #include is hardly controversial.
>
> its not forgotten its unneeded and i said so
> common.h includes several headers and these do not need to be included
> everywhere.
> But that was just one commit, there was the 1->3rd person change (full of
> bugs due to the automated replacing you did) never approved by anyone and
> never posted for review. and the removial of part of the symbol versioning
> documentation against the explicit wish of the maintainer. And thats just
> what i remembetr atm.
> not to mention threatening people with closing their accounts and closing
> jasons account.

Just because Mans does stupid things doesn't exempt you from public
discussion of your patches before they are committed.

Dark Shikari